How Stephen Clarke Debunks Franco-British Myths in 1000 Years of Annoying the French - PDF EPUB Download
1000 Years of Annoying the French: A Book Review
Introduction
If you are looking for a book that will make you laugh, think, and learn something new about history, then you might want to check out 1000 Years of Annoying the French by Stephen Clarke. This book is a witty and irreverent account of how the French and British have been at odds with each other for over a millennium, from 1066 to 2016. The author, who is a British journalist and novelist living in Paris, challenges many of the myths and stereotypes that both sides have about each other, using historical facts, evidence, and humor. In this book review, I will summarize what the book is about, evaluate its strengths and weaknesses, and recommend it to potential readers.
1000 years of annoying the french pdf free 25
Summary of the book
The main themes and arguments
The main theme of 1000 Years of Annoying the French is that there is more to Franco-British history than meets the eye. The author argues that many of the popular beliefs and narratives that both sides have about their past are either false, exaggerated, or distorted by propaganda. For example, he claims that:
The Battle of Hastings in 1066 was not a French victory, but a Norman one. William the Conqueror was not French, but a Viking descendant who hated the French.
The Brits were not really responsible for the death of Joan of Arc in 1431. She was burned at the stake by a French court for wearing trousers.
The guillotine was not a French invention, but an English one. It was first used in Yorkshire in 1286.
The author uses these and many other examples to show how both sides have been annoying each other for centuries, often for trivial or absurd reasons. He also uses humor and irony to expose the biases and prejudices that both sides have about each other's culture, politics, and lifestyle. For instance, he mocks the French for their arrogance, snobbery, and bureaucracy, and the Brits for their hypocrisy, prudery, and xenophobia. He covers a wide range of topics and events, from the Hundred Years' War to the French Revolution, from Napoleon to Churchill, from the D-Day to the Suez Crisis, from the Eurostar to Brexit.
The main sources and references
The author bases his arguments on historical facts and evidence, not opinions or propaganda. He relies on various sources and references to support his claims, such as books, articles, websites, and other media. He also provides a bibliography at the end of the book for further reading. Some of the sources and references that he uses are:
The Oxford History of England, a series of books that covers the history of England from the Roman invasion to the 20th century.
The History of Britain, a BBC documentary series hosted by Simon Schama that explores the history of Britain from the Stone Age to the present day.
1066 and All That, a humorous book by W.C. Sellar and R.J. Yeatman that parodies the history of England from the Roman invasion to World War I.
Yes Minister, a British sitcom that satirizes the relationship between politicians and civil servants in the British government.
Asterix, a French comic book series that follows the adventures of a Gaulish warrior and his friends who resist the Roman occupation of Gaul.
The author acknowledges that his approach is not without limitations and controversies. He admits that he is not a professional historian, but a journalist and novelist who writes for entertainment. He also admits that he is biased towards the British side, as he is a Brit himself. He warns the readers that some of his arguments may be disputed or challenged by other sources and perspectives. He invites the readers to do their own research and form their own opinions.
Evaluation of the book
The strengths and weaknesses
One of the main strengths of 1000 Years of Annoying the French is that it is entertaining, informative, and provocative. The book is full of humor, irony, and sarcasm that make it fun to read. The book is also rich in historical facts, details, and anecdotes that make it educational. The book is also bold in challenging the common myths and stereotypes that both sides have about each other, making it stimulating.
Another strength of 1000 Years of Annoying the French is that it is well-written, well-researched, and well-structured. The book is written in a clear, concise, and engaging style that appeals to general readers. The book is based on historical facts and evidence that are verified by various sources and references. The book is organized into chronological chapters that cover different periods and topics in Franco-British history.
One of the main weaknesses of 1000 Years of Annoying the French is that it may be biased, exaggerated, or inaccurate in some aspects. The book may reflect the author's personal views and preferences more than objective reality. The book may also overstate or understate some facts or events to make them more humorous or dramatic. The book may also omit or ignore some facts or events that do not fit with the author's arguments or agenda.
The target audience and purpose
The target audience of 1000 Years of Annoying the French is general readers who are interested in history, culture, and politics. The book is suitable for both casual and serious readers who enjoy humor and irony. The book does not require any prior knowledge or expertise on Franco-British history, as it provides enough background information and explanations for each topic and event.
The purpose of 1000 Years of Annoying the French is to challenge, educate, and amuse the readers. The book aims to challenge the readers to question their own assumptions and prejudices about Franco-British history. The book aims to educate the readers about the facts and evidence behind Franco-British history. The book aims to amuse the readers with humor and irony about Franco-British history.
Conclusion
The main points and implications
both cultures and histories. The book invites the readers to question their own assumptions and prejudices about Franco-British history. The book is entertaining, informative, and provocative, but also biased, exaggerated, and inaccurate in some aspects. The book is well-written, well-researched, and well-structured, but also limited and controversial in its approach. The book is aimed at general readers who are interested in history, culture, and politics, and who enjoy humor and irony.
The recommendations and suggestions
I would recommend 1000 Years of Annoying the French to anyone who wants to learn more about Franco-British history in a fun and engaging way. The book is worth reading for its humor, irony, and sarcasm that make it enjoyable. The book is also worth reading for its historical facts, details, and anecdotes that make it educational. The book is also worth reading for its bold and original arguments that make it stimulating.
However, I would also suggest that the readers do not take everything in the book at face value. The book may not be the most accurate or objective source of information on Franco-British history. The book may reflect the author's personal views and preferences more than reality. The book may also omit or ignore some important facts or events that do not fit with the author's agenda. Therefore, I would suggest that the readers complement the book with other sources and perspectives on Franco-British history.
FAQs
Where can I find 1000 Years of Annoying the French?
You can find 1000 Years of Annoying the French on various online platforms, such as Amazon, Google Books, or Goodreads. You can also find it in some physical bookstores or libraries.
Who is Stephen Clarke?
Stephen Clarke is a British journalist and novelist who lives in Paris. He is best known for his series of books about Paul West, a British expat who struggles with French culture and bureaucracy. He has also written other books on Franco-British history and culture, such as The French Revolution and What Went Wrong and How the French Won Waterloo (or Think They Did).
Is 1000 Years of Annoying the French a serious or a humorous book?
1000 Years of Annoying the French is both a serious and a humorous book. It is serious in the sense that it is based on historical facts and evidence, not opinions or propaganda. It is humorous in the sense that it uses humor, irony, and sarcasm to expose the biases and prejudices of both sides.
What are some other books that are similar to 1000 Years of Annoying the French?
Some other books that are similar to 1000 Years of Annoying the French are:
A Year in the Merde, by Stephen Clarke. This is the first book in his series about Paul West, a British expat who moves to Paris and faces various challenges and adventures.
The Xenophobe's Guide to the French, by Nick Yapp. This is a humorous guide that explores the stereotypes and quirks of the French culture.
The Discovery of France: A Historical Geography from the Revolution to the First World War, by Graham Robb. This is a serious book that examines how France was shaped by its geography, history, and diversity.
What are some of the benefits and drawbacks of reading 1000 Years of Annoying the French?
Some of the benefits of reading 1000 Years of Annoying the French are:
You will learn something new about Franco-British history in a fun and engaging way.
You will challenge your own assumptions and prejudices about Franco-British history.
You will enjoy humor, irony, and sarcasm that make Franco-British history more interesting.
Some of the drawbacks of reading 1000 Years of Annoying the French are:
You may not get the most accurate or objective information on Franco-British history.
You may be offended, annoyed, or enlightened by some of the arguments or jokes in the book.
You may need to complement the book with other sources and perspectives on Franco-British history.
71b2f0854b